Topic 5
Edward Snowden: the presumption of guilt/innocence
Is Edward Snowden a hero or villain? There's arguments for both cases.
For those who think Snowden is a hero, consider this: The rule of law is a cornerstone for all societies, and considering the notion of national security, Snowden knowingly broke laws whose breakability individuals really don't get to decide on; can we even imagine the consequences if everybody claimed the right to decide which stolen government secrets should be revealed and which shouldn't?
For those who think Snowden is a villain, consider this: Have you considered the information that Snowden, like Bradley Manning (and Julian Assange) before him, made public? Information that we had not just a right but a need to know. Information that was seemingly suppressed because the United States government seems to have evolved to the point that in a truly nonpartisan way it believes it's no longer needs to answer to its citizens.
The fact that there is legitimate cases for both sides of the argument proves that Toffler's (1980) notion of media biased presumption has no place in the modern media, where there is easy accessibility to independent and impartial opinions on matters such as this one, through the use of Blogs and social a media.
The modern media landscape lends itself to George Ritzer's theory on presumption (2010) which argues that due to the rise of user-generated online content, presumption on news stories like Snowden's are more centralised, due to both 'pro' and 'con' arguments being accessible.
Personally, I feel that the blogs, such as this one, and social media pages are a valuable commodity, as they provide and independent and impartial public sphere.
REF
Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010 ‘Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’, Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 10 no. 1, pp 13-36.
Toffler, Alvin. (1980). The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. New York, NY: Bantam.